2. The fact that the defendants recognized the defendants' wrongness and reflects the fact that there is no same criminal history, etc. However, the crime of this case is highly likely to cause social harm by encouraging the people's excessive gambling spirit by exchanging the result of the crime of this case by using game products for which the defendants did not receive classification. Despite the control and punishment of investigation agencies, the crime of this case was committed continuously, repeatedly, and systematically by using the means to have the president, etc., despite the control and punishment of investigation agencies, the defendants led the crime such as opening and operating multiple game rooms as investors or managers. The defendants organized an organization related to the operation of the game room systematically and led the crime, such as equity of punishment against accomplice F, business period, size and profit of the game room, the defendants' age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc., it cannot be said that the punishment imposed by the court below is heavy.

2. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.