However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of four years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle with C low Pest another car.

On December 4, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 14:45 on December 4, 2016, and proceeded at a speed of about 83 km in speed from the direction of the Simpri station to the Simriririririririririririririririri, the E-lane D.

Since the restriction speed is at 60 km a speed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by complying with the car line and the restricted speed and by accurately manipulating the steering gear and the brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to accurately operate the steering gear and steering system while putting the restricted speed more than 23 km, and received the four-lanes and utility poles from the top side of the car above.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim F(45 years), G(52 years), and H(44 years old) who was on board the said car due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement related to a traffic accident;

1. Comprehensive traffic accident analysis report, traffic accident analysis appraisal report and gene appraisal report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the scene photographs of traffic accidents, postmortem photographs of the deceased, and dead bodies of each body of death;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution has resulted in a serious consequence of the death of three victims due to the instant crime. Nevertheless, the Defendant was on the back seat of the driver’s seat at the time of the first police investigation.

The fact that he made a statement and tried to conceal his crime is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, the defendant remains late.