손해배상(산)
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 20 million for each of the Plaintiffs; and (b) 5% per annum from January 31, 2013 to August 16, 2016; and (c).
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On May 2012, the Defendant contracted with Seoul Urban Gas Co., Ltd. for the maintenance and repair of the supply facilities of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yangcheon-gu, and Seoul Urban Gas installed in Yeongdeungpo-gu, and performed the maintenance and repair of gas leakage of valves on the road, which are urban gas facilities, such as the gas leakage maintenance and repair of valves, the replacement of valves, and the replacement of
When the defendant enters a request for repair related to a gas valve from Seoul Urban Gas, he/she inspected a gas valve to C (hereinafter referred to as “C”) and subcontracted the work of repairing the valve in case it is deemed unnecessary to replace the valve as a result of the check.
(C) If it is deemed necessary to replace a valve, the Defendant Company directly conducted the replacement of a valve after blocking gas. (B)
C around 14:40 on January 31, 2013, the network D (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) which is an employee of the C (hereinafter referred to as “C”) returned to the Mandole, knowing that the gas of LNG (main ingredients) was released first while inspecting whether or not to replace a stop valve installed inside the urban gas manle in Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which was subcontracted by the Defendant, for the purpose of checking whether or not the shut-down of the shut-off valve installed inside the urban gas manle in the city gas manle in Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, which was subcontracted by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant construction”). However, the LNG gas did not go out of the Mandole with the knowledge that the gas was released first while checking whether or not the shut-off valve was replaced.
(2) On October 4, 2015, E died due to the instant accident (hereinafter “instant accident”). Around October 15, 2015, the Deceased died due to the malopical brain injury, etc. caused by low oxygen damage.
C. G, working as the Defendant’s safety control manager, sent the Defendant’s staff H on behalf of the Defendant in the instant accident site.
H did not have knowledge of safety rules, etc. to be observed in performing the instant construction work, and the details of the relevant statutes shall be attached.