However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On August 1, 2015, the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) around 01:10 on the front day of the YYY 322 “YYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYY YYYY

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. The Defendant damaged the property at the same time and place as the preceding paragraph, and the Handphones carried on by the victim C in his hand, thereby damaging the property equivalent to KRW 85,00,00, which is the market value of the victim’s possession.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the victim's flag photographs and damaged Hand photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

2. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

3. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the 1st category of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the decision of sentence] of the Criminal Code (the decision of the suspension of execution of official duties) [the decision of the sentence] is against the defendant's wrongness, the damage is relatively minor, and there are no criminal records of the same kind, etc.