업무방해
The Defendants are not guilty.
1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is the environmental U.S. dollars belonging to the Defendants E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”). Defendant A is the branch head of G non-regular labor union G branch office, Defendant B is the head of the G branch office of the public non-regular labor union. From May 25, 2015 to 200 U.S. H of F’s non-regular club environment H was notified of the termination of the work contract from the private company, the Defendants asserted that it is unfair, and demand the G branch office’s work to manage and supervise F’s work to prevent unfair dismissal from occurring at the private company’s 20th day of the above G branch office (excluding the above G branch office’s 20th day of May 26, 2015 to 10:6th day of May 20, 2015 to 20:6th day of the above G branch office’s operation and supervision.
Appellanting, the Defendants were indicted for interfering with their duties.
2. Determination:
A. “Duties” subject to protection of obstruction of duties under the Criminal Act during the assembly from May 26, 2015 to February 5, 2016 is either occupation or continuous.