beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.12.10 2013고단1623

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of the violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence measures) shall be acquitted. Each of the facts charged in the instant case.

Reasons

1. The gist of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person engaging in driving C-container trucks.

On April 24, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on April 24, 2013, while driving the said vehicle along the three-lane road in the direction of Jinhae-gu, Jinhae-gu, Changwon-si, along one-lane from the 3-lane boundary of the Jinhae Police Station, from the 3-lane boundary of the Jinhae Police Station. The Defendant was negligent in driving the MF7 car driven by the victim D (the age of 38) who driven the two-lane in the same direction and driven the vehicle in the same direction.

The Defendant, by its occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim D, such as the “finites and tensions,” which requires approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of the victim E (the victim E (the 67-year-old) who is the passenger of the victimized vehicle, on the part of the victim F (the 67-year-old) for about two weeks of treatment, suffered from the injury of the “finites and tensions,” which requires approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of the victim F (the 67-year-old-old-age-old-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-age-long-age-age-age-age-age-age-long-age-of-

2. Determination

가. 무죄 부분 피고인이 이 사건 교통사고 무렵 핸들이 많이 흔들리는 등 이상한 느낌을 받았다고 진술한 점, 충돌 당시 ‘쾅’ 소리가 났고, 그 충격으로 피해자 차량이 옆 차선으로 밀려나 주변에 있던 차량들이 경적을 울린 점, 이 사건 교통사고로 피해자 차량 좌측 뒷문이 찌그러지고, 좌측 뒤 휀다 부분에 타이어 자국이 남은 점 등에 비추어 피고인이 이 사건 교통사고를 인식하고 있었던 것이 아닌가 하는 상당한 의심이 들기는 한다.

However, the facts charged in a criminal trial should be proved by the prosecutor, and the judge is guilty with evidence of probative value that leads to the conviction that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt.

참조조문