When the defendant does not pay a fine.

On November 5, 2016, around 22:17, 2016, the Defendant confirmed the circumstances of this case, D (40) a police officer belonging to the Dong-gu Police Station C police box in Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, who was called up after receiving a report of 112, stating that “influence of customers inside a taxi,” and called “influence of customers inside a taxi,” and then separated the Defendant from the Defendant at the Defendant’s request of E, and reported that the Defendant was carrying the patrol vehicle into a patrol vehicle to return home, and then, the Defendant would have the back glass of the patrol vehicle and the police officer who prevented the patrol “I want to report back” to D;

Dor.

"........." "............." flabling D’s flab, and threatening D’s flab.

The Defendant interfered with a police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning reporting duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Entry of each police statement protocol with respect to D and E;

1. Application of statutes governing field CCTV images;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;