beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.10.24 2017고단1516

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of B Lastren motor vehicles.

1. On May 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven the said rocketing car under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.129% from the 27km section to the road near the 122km of the Seoul, Cheongdo-si, Cheongdo-si, Cheongdo-si, in around 06:59 on the same day from the front day of the bitdo-dong-si parking lot at a Mado-si, Sinpo-si, Mado-si; (b) around 06:59 on the same day.

2. On May 18, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused before the risk) was driven by 06:59 around 06:19 around the blood, and 0.129% of alcohol concentration in the blood, as described in paragraph (1), and was driven by the said vehicle while driving the said vehicle at a speed of 0.129% at the Cheongdon City, thereby driving the said four-lanes off the Seoul outer expressway outside the Cheongdon City at a speed of an irregular speed depending on the intersection of the Cheongdon City.

At the time, there were many vehicles at the time, and the vehicle was parked due to the string of the vehicle at the front section, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake devices while thoroughly driving the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, rhythm, was hymd, snowd with shock, and the walking condition was extremely unbured due to the influence of alcohol, and so on, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting the duty of the front-time driver on the part of the Defendant Company C (43 ) who was parked on the front side of the Defendant Company C (43 ) due to his negligence, and taken the back part of the Defendant Company C (43) with the front part of the Defendant Company C, which was driven on the front part of the Defendant Company, and the said part of the Defendant Company’s vehicle was pushed into the front part of the Defendant Company E (51 ) with the shock of the said vehicle, and the said vehicle conflicts with the lower part of the Victim E (51 ). The said Hastnsta vehicle was tightly pushed in the future, and then the victim G (46 Doe).