When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 20, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 03:00, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Sungpo-si, Seopo-si, who was operated by the victim B, was able to get in a C-business taxi operated by the victim B and was able to get money; and (b) even before the Jeju-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Jeju-si

However, there was no intention or ability to pay taxi costs.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim operate the taxi to the destination, and did not pay 37,920 won of the fee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of B’s written laws and regulations;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.