근로기준법위반
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is an individual construction business operator, who is the E-representative located in Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si (Change to D) and who, using two full-time workers, executes housing remodeling works from the Gyeongbuk-si, Gyeongbuk-si, 201 to May 20, 2012, using two full-time workers.
From March 12, 2012, the Defendant is working as an internal tree with respect to the site performed by the foregoing company.
Without agreement on the extension of the payment date between the parties, G’s wages of KRW 3,300,000, and H’s wages of KRW 3,300,000,000, which were retired on May 20, 2012, the parties did not pay KRW 6,600,000 within 14 days from the date of retirement, which is the date of the occurrence of the payment cause.
2. The facts charged in this case are crimes falling under Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act. According to the records, the victims can be acknowledged as having withdrawn their wish to punish the Defendant on June 21, 2013, which is after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed under Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.