beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2012.10.18 2012고합118

특수공무집행방해치상

Text

The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment of innocence against the Defendants is published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A is the chairman of Jeju-do branch office of the Association of Jeju-do, and Defendant B is the chairman of the Association of Jeju-do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do on April 11, 2012 and was elected.

On October 25, 201, at around 10:00, the Defendants attended the “Korea-do Association of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province”, which was held by the F Jeju-do Association and the E-do Association, to “Korea-do Association of the Republic of Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement ratification and the Jeju-do Association,” and tried to install a tent by moving H organizations to a sidewalk suitable for the parliamentary report of the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province.

Accordingly, the public officials belonging to the Jeju Viewing Construction and Transportation Bureau established a tent in India, resulting in danger to pedestrian safety and interference with traffic flow, and the Defendants started to put the body fighting with the public officials to stop the removal of the tent installed by the Defendants under the Road Act. A.

Defendant

On October 25, 201, Defendant A caused the obstruction of special performance of official duties by Defendant A, at around 10:37, 201, suffered approximately three percent of the left upper part of the pipe, following the Defendant, who is a public official of Jeju Construction and Transportation Bureau I belonging to the Defendant, in a number of times to the public officials removing the tent installed illegally on the said road (2 meters in length) for the tent installation, which is dangerous in India, at the above Jeju Special Self-Governing Province Administration.

As a result, Defendant A assaulted public officials who carry dangerous objects and remove a tent, thereby hindering J and Jeju audience officials from performing their legitimate duties, and the J suffered from an unexplosion of treatment days.

B. Defendant B’s obstruction of performance of official duties on October 25, 201, at the above place around 10:35, Defendant B, who was engaged in the removal of an illegally installed tent at the same place, was liable for the damage following the Jeju Viewing K’s inorganic contract L.

참조조문