beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.07.13 2017고정393

모욕

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2016. 5. 5. 인터넷 네이버 카페 B 게시판에 닉네임 'C( 아이 디 D)으로 피해자 E이 사용하는 닉네임 'F ’를 향해 ‘F 전화라도 받던가 사기꾼 새 꺄 전화는 왜 안받고 문자질이냐

B. Whether the account holder is not the one of the festestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestest in the currency, and whether the account holder is the only one of the festestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestestest.

Whereever the victim's co-pin lebris is likely to take place, why is the victim's lebane or the victim's lebane with the subscription sent, or with the fraud changed.

What is these, ‘if the human beings live in the world' or ‘if the human beings refuse to do so', is the content security of the text. It is not that the human beings refuse to do so.

It is true that the waste has been paid up to the advance payment, and the width is whether the waste has been opened or not.

"," why is why is not changed from the reverse fraud, and why is why the letter was deleted from the Republic of Korea, which was sold by the Republic of Korea during the deposit of the money.

사람들한테 연락 안 오지 ㅎㅎ 댓 글이나 달게 하고 글 써 본인 인증도 받고 사기꾼 아’' 에라 쓰레기 새 꺄 그럼 처음부터 10 마 넌 먹고 쨀려고 했구 만 어디서 남의 귀한 돈을 너한테 쉽게 주겠냐

The victim was found to have been in contact with him, or who had been in contact with him, or who had been in contact with him, was openly insultingd by posting a letter of "the content" as it had been known.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. The accusation note, Internet camera bulletin, and text message [the Defendant] argued to the effect that the instant text was written for public interest purposes in order to inform the victims of the fraud, and that there was no intention to insult, but the content and the posting of the instant text to the effect that the Defendant did not intend to commit insult, as he did not receive lectures from the victims, but received 100,000 won from the victims.