손해배상(기)
1. The judgment of the first instance court, including a claim that has been reduced and added in the trial, shall be modified as follows:
The defendant.
1. The reasons for this part of the underlying facts are as follows, and the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (including the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, i.e., the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (including the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, i.e., the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance).
After the last day of the "bundling Table by List of Defects in Section 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance", the contents of the "bundling Table by List of Defects in Section 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance" shall be added to the "Attachment 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance" (Supplementary 001) and the "burlingr pipe leakage" column shall be added to the "Singr pipe leakage."
Attached Form 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be written in accordance with the following:
(1) [Exclusive 006] The “13,744” of the “Bedingroom, balcony, multi-use room, and scambling” shall be written by having all “3,878,576”.
(2) [Attachment 092] In short of the inner walls of each household bath room, the “Difference” and “75,035,711” shall be raised to each “-”.
③ [Exclusive 094] In each household’s bathing room, each household’s bathing room, air-to-the-total column of the conduct, “4,915,258,” each of which is “4,915,258.
④ [Attachment] : (19,08,531 won “B,” 22,83,363 won “B,” 150,918,665 won “B,” and “154,63,497 won,” and “(154,663,497 won) of the summary sheet by the defect list of section 2 attached to the judgment of the first instance court, although it is not recognized that the defect of 'exclusive 092' was not included in the aggregate column; (b) while the defect of 'exclusive 094' is described in the '4,915,258 won as remuneration cost’, it is evident that the sum of 'exclusive 'exclusive '4,915,258 won’ is written in the '?, but the above '150,965%' as stated in the aggregate column of the 'exclusive 'exclusive 'D' is not reflected in the above error amount.
Therefore, paragraph (3) is merely a correction of such clerical error, and the part in which actual changes are made in the trial is not only a ‘exclusive 006', and it is also a â……………‘(exclusive 006)'.