2. Determination

A. The lower court determined that the lower court made a statement consistent with the facts charged specifically and consistently from the investigative agency to the court of the lower court, and C, the representative of the victim company, also by the investigative agency, that there was a lot of oil in comparison with that of the ordinary Defendant’s work.

In full view of the facts stated to the purport that “the facts charged can be fully recognized”

Based on the judgment, the defendant was pronounced guilty.

B. We examine the determination of the party deliberation. The following circumstances cited by the court below are found to be met by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below. In other words, G spons G were living almost together with the defendant to ship a dump truck from the defendant at the time of the investigation agency and the court of the court below. On August 19, 2016 and the first day on September 19:00 on the 19:00, the first day on September 2016, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., U.S. C., the dump truck of this case, which the defendant was driven on the fump, parked on the part of the defendant's personal vehicle, and then parked the dump truck of this case, which the defendant was loaded on the dump to the above dump.

A dump truck oil tank in this case is to be connected to the main district of a gallon vehicle by opening a dump truck oil tank, and approximately 50 liter degree of oil shall be deducted.

In other words, we have observed the gallons to injecting them into the gallon vehicles.

At the time, it was known that the dump truck was a defendant's vehicle, and the owner of the dump truck was aware of the victim's company at the latest through another dump truck's sump truck in September 2016.

“The purpose of “ is relatively specific and consistent.”