However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 20, 2018, the Defendant driven a B rocketing car on July 22:27, 2018, and continued to stop immediately and take necessary measures, even though he did not neglect his duty of care to safely drive the said taxi, such as reducing speed and undermining the right and the right and the right, while neglecting his duty of care to safely drive the taxi, the part on the gate of the driver’s seat of the E Drieta taxi was taken as the part of the front part of the said vehicle, and the said taxi was damaged to the extent that the 7,262,828 won volume was damaged to the extent of repairing cost, and did not immediately stop the said taxi.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Each photograph (the sequence 4 through 7 in the list of evidence);

1. Written estimate of repair costs;

1. Application of CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Articles 148 and 54 of the same Act concerning the selective punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Taking into account all the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant's erroneous reasoning for sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc., the fact that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment, and the degree of the defendant's breach of duty of care