If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On September 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim B, “The Defendant would pay expenses incurred in arranging a c sports center to obtain a loan of 3.3 billion won as security, within the c sports center within the spawn platform near the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, he/she thought that he/she not only did not have the intention or ability to arrange the loan to the victim, but also used the money received from the victim for living expenses, etc.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim as above and transferred KRW 10 million from the victim to the Japanese bank account in the name of the Dispute Resolution D, around September 18, 2012, and the same year.

9. The same year in which one million won or more has been transferred to the said Japanese bank account on or around 20.20 won;

9. Around 20.20.5 million won was remitted to the bank account in the name of E.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and defrauds 20.5 million won in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each part of the police suspect examination protocol against the accused (including the statement of each statement in F and B);

1. Protocol concerning the examination of each police officer concerning G;

1. Statement of each police statement related to B and F;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on account transactions;

1. Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 347(1) of the choice of punishment (generally, choice of fines);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;