교통사고처리특례법위반등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
On October 17, 2013, at around 15:30, the Defendant driven a B-car with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.143% 0.14%, and the Defendant driven the front way of the resistant intersection located in the hot spring dong-gu Busan Metropolitan City along the same intersection with the 4-lane from the intersection to the inner intersection.
In such cases, a motor vehicle shall not drive a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking, and a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle, such as reporting the traffic situation well and accurately manipulating the steering gear, etc.
Nevertheless, the defendant is negligent in doing so and is proceeding.
In the same direction, the victim C Drivers who are in the atmosphere signaled four-lanes, and the above taxi was pushed down in the future, and the F-city bus of E driving was concealed due to the shock.
As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C, such as catherum, catum salt, tension, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of treatment by the aforesaid negligence.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A written statement of C and E;
1. Report on collection of blood, and report on the status of the driver, the driver, and the statement of his/her status;
1. Requests for appraisal of blood alcohol concentration and requests for appraisal;
1. A medical certificate;
1. Application of each statute on photographs;
1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents by the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, and the selection of fines;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;