If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be converted into one day.

On August 27, 2011, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would divide profits with money after analyzing the contents of the games, i.e., multi-director, by entering the fixed-line casino,” and then dividing the amount of money from the casino in Gangwon-do, Gangwon-do, Gangwon-do, Gangwon-do. Moreover, the Defendant stated that “The amount of KRW 5 million is the deposit to be returned later.”

However, the defendant calculated the casino living expenses with the credit card in the name of D, and even if he received the deposit from the victim because of the lack of funds, he was thought to use it for the casino living expenses, and did not have the intention or ability to return it to the victim.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 500,000 from the victim under the name of the deposit money, and received KRW 500,000 prior to the Gangseoland Casino around September 4, 201, and acquired the money by deceiving KRW 5,140,00 from the national bank account in the name of D around September 5, 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports (investigation into telephone conversations between a complainant and investigation into telephone conversations);

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;