A. At the time of the instant crime, the Defendant had weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to depression.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (four years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court regarding the claim of mental retardation, it is recognized that the Defendant was suffering from depression at the time of the instant crime, but in full view of the background, means and methods of the instant crime, etc., it does not seem that the Defendant did not seem to have reached a state where the Defendant had the ability to discern things or make decisions at the time of the instant crime.

Therefore, the defendant's argument on this part cannot be accepted.

B. The instant crime of determining unfair sentencing is that the Defendant committed the instant crime with respect to the allegation of unfair sentencing, and the Defendant committed murdered the victim who salvbs over the side in the course of attempting suicide by leaving his body on his own due to economic difficulties, home incombustibleness, depression, etc. at his residence.

Although the Defendant was married to her young age but later divorced due to domestic violence, etc., and later married life appears to have caused depressions in the process of experiencing serious conflicts with her spouse due to difficulties in raising a child due to the appearance of her spouse and economic cause, etc. The Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime in the process of causing suicide while suffering from her husband and wife fighting and moving to the implementation of her suicide without considering the Defendant’s care. The Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime in the process of having been aware of the victim who will grow up without considering her care. The Defendant is currently pregnant, the Defendant was punished three times by a fine due to drinking driving, etc., and there is no other criminal power, and the Defendant’s husband and her husband and her bereaved family members wish not to be punished against the Defendant.