사문서위조등
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that: (a) the Defendant did not obtain permission from the representative (J, N companyO, and P company R) of each of the middle and high-ranking trading companies, the nominal owner of each of the instant estimates; (b) the confirmation and inspection procedures to calculate and indicate the final estimate are accompanied; and (c) the preparation of each of the instant estimates without such procedures is consistent with the intent that the nominal owner delegates the use of the nominal name to the endr in advance and the recognition of the said documents by the general public; (c) thus, the preparation of each of the instant estimates without such procedures is contrary to the intent of the nominal owner; and (d) it is reasonable to deem that the Defendant forged and used each of the instant estimates as stated in the facts charged, but the lower court acquitted the Defendant on
2. The summary of the facts charged is D’s mother, and D and E were married to a war.
D and E were married, and E filed a civil lawsuit with D as the defendant.
However, the Defendant had a mind to forge a motor vehicle accident quotation, not a fact for the purpose of withdrawing a lawsuit.
Forgery of private documents 1 The Defendant: (a) on December 10, 2011, entered in the estimate form of A4 pages prepared at the office of the company of the company of the Grancheon-si located at the time of the Government on December 10, 2011; (b) on December 10, 201; (c) “H return”; and (d) on the supplier column,” affix his J seal to the supplier column, “1”, “27,613,000 new car price in the following low-end quantity column; (c) before the purchase of the new market price of KRW 26,50,000,00,000, after the purchase of the new market price of KRW 15,500,000,000, the price of the vehicle at KRW 15,500,000,000 after the occurrence of the accident; and (d) on the supplier column, 10,500,005,005,00.