beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2012.08.31 2012고단1439

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

However, as to Defendant B and C from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on May 12, 2011, after being sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry at the Jung-gu District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, the said judgment becomes final and conclusive on May 20, 201 and is currently suspended.

1. At around 00:00 on May 23, 2012, the Defendants’ co-principal Defendants driven a HA car on a molded machine installed in front of the G cafeteria near the G cafeteria in the city of the Government, and reported the network inside the vehicle. Defendant C saw that people coming from the area around the string machine, and Defendant A carried 50,000 won in cash, which was opened a string machine and kept in the string machine inside the cash string machine.

In addition, from around 01:00 to June 02:07 of the same day, the Defendants habitually stolen KRW 611,000 in cash owned by the victim I, J, K, L, M, N, andO by the same method 18 times in total, as indicated in the crime sight table (i).

Accordingly, the Defendants committed a theft of the victims' property jointly and habitually.

2. On May 26, 2012, at around 06:00 on May 26, 2012, Defendant A and B: (a) driven by and going to the HA car in the string machine installed on the road in front of the Pocheon-si PP in Macheon-si; and (b) Defendant A opened a type of machine locked for the victim’s M by using the key tendinger, and carried 50,000 won in cash stored in the cash slot box.

In addition, from around that time to around May 2012, the Defendants habitually stolen the amount of KRW 122,000 in cash owned by the victim I, K, and M in the same way four times in total, as indicated in the crime sight table (2).

Accordingly, the Defendants committed a theft of the victims' property jointly and habitually.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement about K, M, or L;

1. Each of theO, N, I, and J.