사기등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
Seized evidence2 through 21 shall be confiscated from the accused.
Punishment of the crime
1. On May 2016, the Defendant: (a) proposed to take part in the commission of the crime from a person who was unaware of the name of the so-called Bophishing organization; and (b) provided that a member of the organization, by misrepresenting the financial institution’s staff member, etc. to transfer money to the account of the so-called passbook; (c) the Defendant withdrawn cash using a cash card connected to the said account received from the said account in accordance with the order of the said person’s name and conspired to receive KRW 20,000 per day for the withdrawal.
Accordingly, the staff of the singishing service shall:
A. On May 27, 2016, 09:30, by calls from the victim C at an unspecified place, and misrepresenting the victim C to make a refund to the SC Loan Review Team D at a low interest rate of 7.8% and 22 million won. However, it is not consistent with the existing terms and conditions. On the other hand, it is false to say that “a loan from the present high interest rate is possible to be lent to the victim at a low interest rate of 7.8% and at a low interest rate of 22.0 million won.” On the other hand, it is false to say that “a transfer money is lent to the victim on the basis of repayment on the same day at another place,” the victim in this context shall be conveyed to the victim at around 16:40 of the same month.
B. On May 30, 2016, at an irregular place around 09:00, the victim G calls and misrepresents the victim G to pay the existing loan first in order to increase the credit point if the loan is required. In short, the payment of the existing loan would be possible and thus, it would be remitted to an account in which the amount equivalent to the existing loan is not paid, as the existing loan would be possible. In short, the victim, at around 12:35 on the same day, remitted the amount of KRW 3 million to the account in the name of the E at least three times.
As above, the Defendant withdrawn 6.2 million won from the above account and received the money without passbook from the account designated by the person who received the above name, and delivered it to him.
As such, the defendant is not entitled to name.