beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.10.18 2018고정428

마약류관리에관한법률위반(마약)

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who purchased and sold a house located in Jinan Army B in the former North Korea-U.S. around September 2017 to C.

In July 2016, the Defendant discovered spawn and spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn on the ma of the above house and cultivated the spawn spawn on the ma.

As a result, around June 8, 2018, trading with C around June 8, 2018, 760 weeks at the E's house located in Jinan-gun, the neighbor of the same day, and 132 weeks at the end of E's house located in Jinan-gun, the adjoining People's Republic of Korea.

2. Determination

A. The main point of the defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense plant, after being aware that the plant of one week, who was born on the part of the Defendant’s house, died with spawn and spawned, spawn and scattered around, and did not cultivate it

B. Whether the Defendant, recognizing that it was a cost of return to the Republic of Korea, has cultivated it or not, 1) Recognizing that it was a cost of return to the Republic of Korea, referring to the act of selling, managing, and harvesting, and constitutes cultivation even if it was a seed

2) According to the evidence examined by this court, the following facts are acknowledged.

① Around August 2017, the Defendant sold to C a house located in Jinan-gun B (hereinafter “instant house”) in the former North Korea, and C, around May 2018, was aware of the flowers of the instant house and reported it to the police on June 8, 2018, on the ground that the Defendant was aware of the fact that the said house was put to a fireworks on the Marin-gun of the instant house.

② The police, upon receipt of a report by C, collected 130 shares of both return from the house head of the instant house to 760 shares of both return, and from the house head of E, his neighbor E.

③ At the police station in 2017, E had a flowersd from the instant house in 2017; however, at the same time, E had avoided the flowers at its home and had never known that it was at all.

was stated.

3) The foregoing factual relationship and the evidence investigated by this court are acknowledged as follows.