2. We examine whether the judgment of the defendant et al. provided medical treatment E, etc. as recorded in the medical records.

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below, the defendant employed interpreter E and F for "X" with the content of punishment against foreign tourists, etc., and the defendant demanded an interpreter E and F to enter personal information on the first class card in the course of providing pre-education to E, etc. at one's own Council member. He stated his personal information on the first class card, and E, etc., and the defendant made a personal experience. The defendant was forced to cut off the back to e, etc., and the defendant was forced to set off e, etc. at one's own Council member upon the completion of the day, and in this case, the defendant et al. was forced to e et al. al., to e to e, or to see whether she was f to e or not, and it was recognized that the defendant had harmed ma

However, according to the medical records written by the Defendant, E was given a prescription that “the salts and tension in the parts of the Health and upper bones of the Health of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the b.