업무방해
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
Even if the injured party of the gist of the grounds for appeal has the duty to return the culture of this case to the accused, he/she constitutes a duty to be protected, and even if he/she recognized the perception or intent of obstructing the defendant's business, the court below which acquitted the defendant of the facts or erred by misapprehending the legal principles
Judgment
A. On March 18, 2013, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case: (a) the Defendant was awarded a successful bid for the dynasium facilities in six lots, including the Gun Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do
On December 27, 2013, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the victim who continues to engage in the culture culture in the culture culture, and did not execute delivery, and the victim continued to engage in the culture culture in the culture culture in the culture culture.
On May 13, 2014, from around 09:00 to around 10:30 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) from E Co., Ltd. located in E Co., Ltd. in Dondonnam Island, the Defendant: (b) from around 09:00 to around 10:30 on May 13, 201, the Defendant: (c) reported on the site of the Defendant Co., Ltd.; (d) from the phone of the vice president G; and (e) from the damaged party, the pumps of the electric eroposp has been operated by telephone; (e) the vehicle in the air did not supply sea water to the eroposp; (e) caused the death of the erospher; and (e) was demanded to enter
As a result, the defendant interfered with the victim's whole culture by force.
B. The lower court did not regard it as a legitimate business to be protected by the victim’s her her her her her her her her her her her her
It is difficult to see the facts charged in this case, and if the defendant is found guilty, the victim shall borrow a claim for damages against the defendant and receive the return from the victim properly.