업무상과실치상
The defendant will give public notice of the summary of the decision.
1. The Defendant is a beauty artist, and the Defendant was a beauty artist at the D Beauty Room located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, around 11:00 on November 29, 2015. In such a case, the Defendant had a duty of due care to prevent damage to the victim’s hair by taking into account the victim’s hair condition, etc., while neglecting his/her duty of care to ensure that the victim’s hair does not damage the victim’s hair. In such a case, the Defendant, while neglecting his/her duty of care, caused the victim to suffer from the injury of the victim’s marcule in the number of days of treatment (the marcing shape) with a mardd (the marcing shape of the hair) with his/her hair (the marcing of the hair) with his/her hair at the heat treatment temperature, raising the heat treatment temperature by occupational negligence.
Shots: Ramps
2. Summary of the defendant's lawsuit;
A. A beauty artist with about 10 years of absence of duty of care (counseling phase) was authorized to perform a clean clinic (central hairment) by examining the state of the victim’s hair, but the victim refused to perform a general pumps.
Before the procedure, even though the victim had a little amount of clock as required, the previous clock clock damage remains, the victim was entitled to a clock clinic, and the victim was unable to bear the expenses, but the victim was able to correct the clock pumps.
(Procedure) However, as the procedure is not in the state of immediate operation, without being paid, the protective agents were captured, and the victim’s strong demand was administered with the largest lot, and even if it was used in a way different from the general procedure law (20 minutes’ neglect from 110 to 120°C) due to the severe damage of the king, there was a damage to maternity (as a result, approximately 15 minutes’ neglect from approximately 90°C).
Although the damage of hair is anticipated, since the victim's hair was not returned to himself/herself as he/she is fine due to the extreme demand by the victim, his/her hair can not be recognized as a breach of duty of care.
Last, there was a mutual agreement that the victim will return to the original state through a damage escape clinic, and the victim will change.