However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 24, 2015, around 22:50, the Defendant drinked alcoholic beverages, such as the victim B (54) in front of the Government-dong 274's Dog-dong 274 Dog-dong 274 Dog-si, and the Defendant saw the victim as bad before the exit 274 Dog-dong 274 Dog-dong, on the ground that the victim is a dangerous object at the bar, the Defendant 19cc wide, 14cm in width, 8cc thick, the head of the victim's left-hand body was cut one time, and the victim suffered two parts of the number of days of treatment for the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant’s legal statement

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victims and news reporting block;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts of the relevant crime;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (amended by Act) (i.e., the reason for sentencing, which is more favorable to the following), is that the criminal liability is not weak in light of the risk of the attitude of the instant crime.

However, the defendant recognizes all his mistake and reflects it.

The victim does not want to be punished against the defendant.

Until now, the defendant has been punished by fine three times, and there is no same record of crime.

In addition, the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of various sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.