총포ㆍ도검ㆍ화약류등단속법위반
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The court below rejected the admissibility of evidence of the prosecutor's grounds for appeal on the grounds that there is sufficient evidence such as the defendant's confession statement and investigation report, etc. The court below found the defendant not guilty on the ground that there is an error of law by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
(In fact-finding) 2. Judgment
(a) A summary of the facts charged 1) Anyone appears to be similar to that of a gun or any similar gun (hereinafter referred to as “agression gun”);
(2) On May 18, 201, the Defendant, from around May 24, 201, was not in possession pursuant to Presidential Decree. Nevertheless, from around May 24, 201, 1 stud gun (TNT SUB), 1 stud gun (P9C), 1 stud gun (62062), 1 studs (D.M.M.0097), 1 studs (ABS0624), 1 studs (WALP99), 1 studs (M11A1), and 1 studs (M191A1) purchased at the wall of the apartment-gu Incheon Housing Development Corporation (M191.2). The Defendant was in possession of a maternal gun.
5. DH085749) one set and two knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif.