부동산중개보수료
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. All costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the first instance is that of the first instance court, except for the addition of the judgment under paragraph 2 below, and therefore, it is citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420
2. The witness P testified to the effect that “the fact that theO was an employee of Defendant D was not a dispute between the parties, and that O was paid KRW 10,000,000,000 from the currency of the Plaintiff around October 12, 2017.” The witness P testified to the effect that “the Plaintiff was paid KRW 28,88,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won from Defendant D at the time of the real estate purchase and sale contract.”
However, the circumstances revealed by the first instance court and ① the above P testified that the above 10 million won was paid as real estate brokerage commission and activity expenses. ② The above 10 million won was stated in the receipt (Evidence A 2) for the above 10 million won as part of the commission, and the following stated that the above 7 million won was paid to the above consulting firms. ③ Considering that the above 10 million won was actually delivered to P and Q as it is, the above 10 million won was not considered to have been actually paid as real estate brokerage commission, the evidence submitted by the first instance court and the Plaintiff agreed to pay the above P's real estate brokerage commission.
It is insufficient to recognize that the real estate sales contract was a sexual intercourse as the plaintiff's act of brokerage.
The plaintiff's assertion is without merit.
3. The judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and all appeals against the Defendants by the Plaintiff are dismissed.