beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.06.20 2013고정803

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who has engaged in a general game providing business under the trade name of the Suwon-si B building and the second floor of the building.

The defendant from May 25, 2011 to the same year.

6. Until August 8, 200, a set of 60-ast games in the above game room and had many unspecified customers find the game.

In addition, the above game product is produced in a case game with a cover game, and if the five cards appear on the screen, the user was given an opportunity to exchange the remainder by using five pressings, and then the number and the door of the card last owned is given points according to the number and the pattern of the card, and the number of the card to be added as an additional game is lower than seven (HIGH). As a result, the game product was rated by the Game Rating Board to have the game run in a way that the score of this game is double or extinguished.

However, even if the game products provided by the defendant in the above game room do not make any decision-making and pressing, the points are determined according to the combination of given cards, and the one-time game is terminated, etc., and the amount of the game products can be distributed to the so-called so-called so-called “supper section,” and the game products are opened and altered so as to encourage the users’ gambling.

As a result, the defendant provided game products with contents different from the classification.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to the prosecution against D and A;

1. Examination protocol of suspect E by the prosecution;

1. In relation to the use of investigation reports (general), investigation reports (general), confirmation of the business period, investigation reports (general)-USB;

1. Responses to each appraisal result, and replys to the results of digital evidence analysis;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;