폭행
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding) is that the Defendant did not depict the victim's chest with a bad arms, and the victim was suffering from building materials by himself/herself, and some physical contacts were made between the Defendant and the victim.
Even if the defendant did not have the intention of assault.
2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the judgment of the court below and the court below and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., ① the victim statement from the investigative agency to the court below to the purport that “the defendant was tightly damaged in the center near the road boundary by fasting the chest,” and also stated to the same purport in the investigative agency and the court of the court below. ② The defendant himself stated to the effect that “the defendant himself has fightd without any intention,” and the I, the witness of the court of the court of the trial, also cut off the victim’s body towards D head, and it was hard to view the victim’s body (the defendant and the victim) as well as the victim’s body, following the victim’s testimony to the effect that “the victim was sickly damaged in the road at the scene by the victim’s cellphone, and the victim’s son and the victim did not have any core conflict between the victim and the victim’s son and the victim’s son.”