2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

A. On May 20, 2010, the Plaintiff called up as public interest service personnel and served in Ansan-si B, and dismissed on May 20, 2012.

B. On November 15, 201, the Plaintiff asserted that he/she was subject to traffic accident (hereinafter “instant accident”) on the top of the same pansty distance crosswalk in the same pansty distance (hereinafter “instant accident”), among those having discovered a hospital near the pansty line located in the pansty zone in Ansan-dong, in order to treat damp infection, who was a volunteer who had been re-explosive during his/her service during his/her service, and filed an application for registration with the Defendant on October 30, 2012, by applying for “in the instant injury” (hereinafter “instant injury”).

C. On May 1, 2013, on the ground that “the instant wound caused by the instant accident is not recognized as a direct relation or proximate causal relation with the performance of duties,” the Defendant stated in the evidence No. 28 of the decision that the Plaintiff was not a person who rendered distinguished services to the State and the person eligible for veteran’s compensation. However, the Plaintiff is deemed to have filed an application for registration with the Minister of Patriots and Veterans Affairs pursuant to Article 6 of the former Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (amended by Act No. 11731, Apr. 5, 2013; hereinafter “Act on Persons of Distinguished Services to the State”), but Article 4 of the former Act on Support for Persons of Distinguished Services to the State (amended by Act No. 11731, Apr. 5, 2013; hereinafter “Act on Persons of Distinguished Services to the State”). Article 6(1) of the Act on Persons of Distinguished Services to the State provides that the Plaintiff applied for registration pursuant to Article 6(2).