beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.06.13 2014고합26

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant and the victim C (the age of 31) continued to pose a threat to the victim by sending text messages, etc. stating that “The Defendant and the victim (the age of 31) continued to live from around August 2013 to around October 2013, and the Defendant continued to live together with the victim, showing that they continued to live together with the victim.” On January 2014, 2014, the Defendant and the victim (the age of 31) had been notified of different terms from that of “the Defendant and the victim would no longer live with the victim,” and sending text messages, etc. to the victim.

1. On January 18, 2014, around 14:00, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively, deadly weapons, etc.), injured the Defendant, or damaged the property: (a) opened the entrance to the Defendant on the ground that the victim was not able to escape and walk out of the house; (b) opened the entrance on the ground that the victim was not able to escape and walk out of the house; and (c) demanded the victim to enter the entrance password of the above residence. However, when the Defendant and the victim entered the house, the Defendant did not enter the entrance password of the Defendant, and caused the victim to enter the victim’s personal identification number by promptly opening the entrance, and entering the victim’s personal identification number into the house, and (d) opened the victim to the effect that the victim was frighted.”

The defendant, who entered the above house with the victim, stated that the victim of the victim was born together with the words, but was false when he did not live together with the defendant, he was out of the dominer that he was born for the hedging with the defendant, and was collected boomed with the victim in the ward, and the head of the office who was in front of the toilet was able to take care of the victim.