When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant first met or mixed the victim B at the “Dju” store located in Ugdong-gu, U.S., U.S., and claimed the issue of treatment related to age while drinking alcohol, and then the victim left the cell phone (LG G2) of his own possession on the above DJ table.

On May 18, 2015, at around 23:00, the Defendant: (a) placed the cell phone owned by the victim in order to return the cell phone; (b) left the cell phone on the first floor; and (c) the Defendant got fishing to the Defendant; and (d) the Defendant asked the Defendant “I will not be the Defendant”; and (b) the Defendant again called the Defendant “I will not be the Defendant,” “I will not take the hand phone of B (victim)” that the said “I will not take the hand phone,” the Defendant left the cell phone on the floor, and followed the cell phone again, “I will???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

As a result, the defendant damaged the 800,000 won of the mobile phone purchase owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each statement of B and E;

1. The defendant denies part of the facts charged (including attached photographs) that the part of the body of the victim’s cellphone on the floor cannot be recognized by recognizing that the part of the body of the victim’s cellphone was brought to the floor and brought to the floor in the future, and the part of the part of the charges cannot be recognized. However, according to the witness E’s testimony, the above evidence, in particular, recognizes the above facts charged that the defendant denied, and further, the defendant stated that the defendant cannot memory how he would damage the victim’s cellphone and how he would have come to the victim’s cellphone under the influence of alcohol. Thus, the defendant’s above assertion is not accepted.).

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 366 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Article 70(1) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.