beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.02.03 2016노2112

특수상해등

Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 피고인 A 이 사건 공소사실 중 2016. 3. 31. 경 도박의 점과 관련하여, 피고인이 위 일시에 화투를 이용하여 ‘ 도리 짓고땡’ 도박을 하였으나, 실상은 다른 도박 참가자들이 목화 투 등의 도구를 사용하여 사기도 박을 한 것이어서 자신은 위와 같은 사기도 박의 피해자에 불과하므로 도박죄가 성립하지 않고, 가사 도박행위에 해당한다고 하더라도 자신은 다른 도박 참가자들이 계속하여 사기도 박을 하는 것이 아닌지 밝혀내기 위하여 도박에 참여한 것이어서 도박의 범의가 없었으므로, 이 부분 공소사실을 유죄로 인정한 원심판결에는 사실을 오인하여 판결에 영향을 미친 위법이 있다.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court against the Defendants C and D (Defendant C: 6 months of imprisonment, Defendant D: fine of KRW 5 million) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court, the lower court’s determination on Defendant A’s assertion 1 can be recognized that, in light of the evidence duly admitted and examined, the ordinary gambling was conducted in a state where the circumstances, such as satisfeing, were removed, to the extent that there was a suspicion about fraud, such as satfeing, on March 31, 2016, from around 07:00 to around 12:00, the date indicated in this part of the facts charged.

In light of the facts charged, this part of the charges was convicted.

2) On March 31, 2016, the lower court duly adopted and examined the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence, namely, (i) the Defendant, while making gambling from around 05:00 on March 31, 2016 to around 05:0, and (ii) emphasizing that a certain gambling participant is taking advantage of a large amount of money so that he/she is suspected of gambling; (iii) he/she was replaced by a part of the scambling used in around 07:0 on the same day, and continued gambling from around 12:0 on the same day as indicated in the facts charged, and (iv) he/she continued to do so.