When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. 공무집행방해 피고인은 2015. 3. 23. 21:30경 서울 광진구 B, 지하 ‘C 스탠드바’에서 요금을 내지 않겠다면서 주점의 업주와 시비를 벌이다가, 신고를 받고 출동한 서울광진경찰서 D파출소 소속 경찰관 E으로부터 제지를 당하자 화가 나, E의 팔을 잡아 당기고, 멱살을 잡아 밀치고, 발로 E의 정강이를 찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning criminal investigations by police officials.

2. The Defendant expressed, at the time, at the place specified in the foregoing Paragraph 1, that “I am out of 37 years old, I am out of 5 to 37 years old, the victim E (hereinafter “I am out, I am out of am out, I am out of am out, I am out, I am out of am out, I am out of am out, I am out of am out, I am out of am out, I am out of am out, I am

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to F and E;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (limited to images and photographs of which the obstruction of performance of official duties and insult of a suspect A is recorded);

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing performance of official duties and the choice of fines) concerning criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Selection of a fine and determination of the same punishment as the order shall be made in consideration of the fact that the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act has no previous convictions in the same kind;