A. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). In addition, considering the various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and pleadings, such as the fact that the instant crime was committed in a planned and organized manner, and the nature of the relevant crime is not good, even if considering the circumstances asserted by the Defendant and the prosecutor as the grounds for appeal, the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or it cannot be deemed that the lower court exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion by putting the Defendant into force, even when considering the circumstances asserted as the grounds for appeal.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.