A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendants are not authorized to handle narcotics.

1. Defendant A

A. At around 12:00 on May 20, 2013, the Defendant possessed approximately 0.08gg of psychotropic drugs, a psychotropic drug, on the front day of national collection in Jinju-si, Jinju-si.

B. At around 12:40 on May 20, 2013, the Defendant injected approximately 0.05g of Metepia 0.05g by dilutioning Metepia with bio-biologicals at Epins located in Jinju-si, and administered them in a way of inserting injection with a disposable injection device.

C. On October 2013, the Defendant administered approximately 0.03 g of Metepia in a way that Metepia d's residence plan for the Defendant, which was located in the Republic of Korea F, by dilutioning 0.03g of Metepia with a single-use injection device with a single-use injection device.

At around 18:00 on March 18, 2014, the Defendant delivered approximately 0.03 g of the Mamba-gu G from Hamba-gu, Busan. 602 to B.

E. The Defendant above D.

At the same time, at the same time and place as the paragraph, approximately 0.03 g of the Metetrapian dilutiond with aquatic water and administered them in a way that they put in injection to the meconculosis by using a disposable injection device.

2. Defendant B

A. On May 2013, the Defendant administered approximately 0.03 g of mert cams cams in the Iel located in the G of the Seo-gu Busan, by dilutioning 0.03g of mecams into aquatic water, using a disposable injection device for the purpose of injection in the mecamcamconsis.

B. On March 18, 2014, around 18:00, the Defendant was delivered approximately 0.03g of Meteptians from A, Hel 602 located in G in Busan Seo-gu.

C. The Defendant was above B.

At the same time, at the same time and place as the paragraph, approximately 0.03 g of the Metetrapian dilutiond with aquatic water and administered them in a way that they put in injection to the meconculosis by using a disposable injection device.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Statement of seizure of each police;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing requests for appraisal;

1. Defendants: the pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts and the choice of punishment: narcotics.