2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. 1) B The farming association corporation (hereinafter “the farming association of this case”)

A) On June 23, 2009, the G Institute of Logistics (hereinafter referred to as the “instant logistics center”) is the G Institute, a neighboring land, before constructing wells, etc. on two lots, such as Jeonsung-gun, Jeonsung-gun, and F.

(2) The agreement between the D Co., Ltd. and the D Co., Ltd. with respect to the following (hereinafter referred to as the “instant agreement”).

1) Upon entering into a contract with the Defendant on the following day (hereinafter referred to as “existing Postal Co., Ltd.”)

1) The Plaintiff filed an application for the extension of the land of this case to the Defendant on 205, as the Plaintiff filed a civil petition for the extension of the land of this case on 205, 2007, on the following grounds: (a) on June 26, 2009 with the construction permit to newly construct a new livestock shed, and obtained approval for use on January 8, 2010 (Evidence A No. 1 and B No. 8 and 9). The farming association of this case bears the following obligations: (b) on the following grounds: (c) on the ground of the pleasant and clean management of the existing livestock shed; and (d) the Plaintiff did not raise any objection against the infertility of livestock caused by cars, etc.; (d) on the c) on the c) the logistics center’s surface was lost so as not to cause damages to the existing livestock shed; and (d) even on the occurrence of damages, the Plaintiff filed an application for the extension of the previous land of this case with D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the instant land of this case”).

(hereinafter referred to as “instant application”. Existing evidence Nos. 3, 4, and 12)