투자금반환
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiffs are married and married, and the Defendant was in a relationship with the Plaintiff B, and the Defendant and the Plaintiffs were in a relationship with the Plaintiff around September 2009, but the Defendant and the Plaintiffs were in a partnership with “D” around September 201, and KRW 120,000,000 (= KRW 30,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 for the Defendant’s loans under the name of the Defendant for global liquor loans of KRW 60,000 (However, with respect to the loans to micro enterprises and Han Bank, the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff jointly and severally guaranteed the Defendant’s loans of KRW 30,00,00.
[2] On November 201, 201, the term “E” (hereinafter “instant restaurant”) began to operate a club with the high-term estimated waste bags (hereinafter “E”).
B. The instant restaurant business was operated by the Defendant, and each of the accounts was used by Han Bank F (hereinafter “instant F account”), Han Bank G (hereinafter “instant G account”), and Han Bank H (hereinafter “instant H account”) with respect to the said business.
C. On July 2014, the Plaintiffs and the Defendant sold the instant restaurant to Nonparty I KRW 172,00,000 (=a lease deposit of KRW 112,000,000 for a premium of KRW 60,000 for a premium of KRW 112,00,000 for a premium of KRW 120,000), and the said loan was fully repaid.
From November 29, 201 to June 27, 2014, the Plaintiffs received 11,851,000 won (i.e., total amount of KRW 17,621,000 in total - total of KRW 5,770,000 in total) from the Defendant in substance from the Defendant during the business period of the instant restaurant. As above, the Plaintiffs received KRW 4,00,000 in check from the Defendant as a check at the time of selling the instant restaurant business.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 6, 7 and Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 6, the whole purport of the pleading
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion (1) The sum of the money invested by the plaintiffs in collaboration with the defendant in the early stage for the restaurant business of this case is KRW 273,80,000 in total (= KRW 120,000 in total (= KRW 153,80,000 in total of the remaining money remaining after working together with the defendant D).