On May 3, 2018, from around 02:00 to 03:00 on the same day, the Defendant considered the victim E (e.g., 12 years old) who became aware of the Defendant’s residence in the E-mail “D” display of smartphones from E-si B and C, the Defendant’s residence, as a Frogate, to the victim E (e.g., 12 years old).

걔처럼 ”, “ 오빠가 있을 때 잘해. 그때는 천 사니까. 가버리면 악마로 변하지”, “ 내가 널 떠나면 G에 안 좋은 거로 퍼진다고. 이런 식으로”, “ 나 이제 화성 시에 있는 학교 E이란 사람 찾는다.

보지 가슴 찍어 그럼. 이제 내 노예해”, “ 그 짓한 지 10년인데. 여태 신고 안 들어와”, “ 빡 치게 하네

He knows that he was aware of the fact that he was aware of the Ma, who was aware of the fact that he was aware of the Ma, and sent his face and chest photographs to G in the same way and threatened the victim to spread them to G in the same way, and if he was sent his face, chest, and sound photograph from the victim, he continued to spread the above photograph without having sexual intercourse from e-mail.0.0.

Intimidationd victims, such as threats.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Efafics of H conversationss;

1. E-mail of the victim and the suspect e-mail closure photographs among the H dialogues;

1. Application of the F diaphific Acts and subordinate statutes to a closure of the conversation;

1. Relevant Article 283 of the Criminal Act, Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, grounds for sentencing of sentence of imprisonment, and grounds for sentencing;

1. The scope of punishment by sentence: Imprisonment for one month to three years;

2. Victims who are vulnerable to the crime in the aggravated area (4 months to 1 year and 6 months) of the aggravated area (4 months to 1 year and 6 months) of the sentence recommended according to the sentencing criteria (the scope of recommendation).

3. The defendant, who is aware that the victim is a 14-year old student, has a defect in the sexual intercourse with the victim, thereby reducing 900,000 won.

In order to boost the sex of children and juveniles, it is judged that the victim does not respond to it.