However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On July 23, 2016, at around 00:30 on July 23, 2016, at a restaurant operated by the victim D, the Defendant, despite receiving a demand for smoking tobacco from the victim, he/she singinging the cigarette on the floor, and making it possible for the Defendant to take away from the restaurant without justifiable grounds, even though he/she received a demand from the victim by singinging the cigarette on the floor, she would be good for the president, and women to sit together and drink and drink drinking together. The Defendant did not go through a restaurant over about 30 minutes until the police officer in receipt of the 112 report is called out.

The Gu did not comply with the Gu.

2. On July 23, 2016, at around 01:05, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) entered a restaurant in which the police officer who received 112 report was called and went away from the restaurant; and (b) thereby interfering with the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance over five minutes, such as: (a) entering a tea restaurant in which the police officer who received 112 report was called and driving away from the restaurant; (c) and (d) who was willing to find the reported person; and (d) who was ever who was ever ever, she was able to find the reported person.

3. Around 03:00 on July 23, 2016, the Defendant damaged things used by public offices by exposing a cover with a change of 9,000 won at the toilet room of the Incheon Police Station located in 27, as the spring site was used in the city of 03:00, and by walking a cover with a change of 9,000 won in a toilet installed in the course of being arrested as a flagrant offender.

4. In order to prevent the Defendant’s self-harm, the Defendant committed an act of obstruction of performance of official duties by putting a cover with the foregoing changeer at the time and place mentioned in paragraph (3) and attempted to injure his head at several times, and when the slope F belonging to the Incheon Police Station E in the detention room came into the detention room to restrain him, and assault the above F’s eye with his finger.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the police officer F's protection duty.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the F, D, and G;

1. A report on internal investigation (in addition to suspicions such as damage to goods for public use) and a slope of a report on internal investigation;