However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal history] On June 11, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million from the Jeju District Court to a fine of KRW 1,00,000 due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving), and on July 18, 201, the same court received a summary order of KRW 4 million from a fine of KRW 1,00,00 due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).

[Criminal facts] On August 29, 2017, the Defendant driven B Poter truck under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.092% from the 1km section to the 1km road in front of Jeju-si, Jeju-si, Jeju-si, Jeju-si, 21:00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report, and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting a crime: The provision of Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of imprisonment;

1. Reduction of amount: Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Consideration to recognize and reflect a crime);

1. Suspension of execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Protection observation and order to attend education: The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is as follows: (a) the degree of alcohol contained in the blood transfusion at the time of the instant case; (b) the fact that the Defendant had been punished for the same kind of crime, in addition to the previous conviction in the instant case; and (c) the fact that such circumstances as the circumstances after committing the crime