beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.07.07 2014고정2892

예배방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, around 11:00 on June 29, 2014, reported the worship with eight believers in the distribution of G church located in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, as well as eight believerss, there is no relationship with the G church.

The noise at the platform and D, and the noise at the platform with the above H interfered with the towing for about 30 minutes of the act of scising the scisf and reading the scisf and read the scisfic book under the direction of the platform with the above H.

2. On July 6, 2014, at around 11:05, the Defendant reported the worship with eight believerss in the instant G church distribution. “H pastors do not have any relationship with G church.”

B. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.

Summary of Evidence

1. The portion of the statement made by the witness H in the fifth public trial record;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the accused by the prosecution;

1. The part concerning the statement of H in the second police interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 158 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the above act of the defendant by the defendant is dismissed as a legitimate act or self-help act.

In order to normalize the above church, the defendant committed the above act with the aim of normalizing the above church.

Even if the defendant's religious sentiment is included in the legal interests to protect the obstruction of worship, and the defendant's act does not seem to have any other means to achieve its purpose, so the defendant's act is also included in the legal interests to protect the obstruction of worship.