구상금
1. The Defendant: (a) within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased B to the Plaintiff, KRW 24,905,220; and (b) on June 30, 2016.
Since the Defendant does not clearly dispute the facts stated in the attached Form “Cause of Claim” and “the cause of modified claim”, it shall be deemed that the Defendant led to the confession of the Plaintiff’s assertion in accordance with the main sentence of Article 150(
Meanwhile, Article 21 (2) of the Crime Victim Protection Act provides that the State shall subrogate the right to claim compensation for damages that a person to receive the relevant relief fund has on the ground of criminal damage subject to relief within the scope of the relief fund paid.
Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff, who exercises the right to claim damages against C’s net B, damages of KRW 24,905,220, and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 5% per annum from June 30, 2016 to August 4, 2016, which is the day following the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case from June 30, 2016, and 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the day of full payment. Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case is justified, and is so decided as per Disposition.