The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower judgment that found the instant facts charged guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the distinction between the act of introducing, mediating, or soliciting patients and the act of medical advertisement,

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.