교통사고처리특례법위반등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On January 28, 2008, the Defendant was issued, respectively, a summary order of KRW 1.5 million by the Daegu District Court on the same day as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and a fine of KRW 1 million by the same court on September 17, 2009.
On June 4, 2014, at around 22:05, the Defendant driven a c motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol of about 200 meters in a section of approximately 00 meters of alcohol content from the front of the citizen playground located in Maldong-gu, Daegu, Daegu to the front of the Maldong-dong 2.
2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a franchise vehicle under paragraph (1).
The Defendant, as described in paragraph (1) of the temporary border, proceeded at a speed of about 40 km along three-lanes from the direction of the high zone to the south Vene-distance along the road of 4-lanes in front of the Taesungsung-dong 2, Taesung-dong, Daegu Dolsung-dong, under the influence of alcohol, as described in paragraph (1).
Since the E car driving volume of the E Car driven driven by the victim D(38 years old) was in progress at the bed bank, there was a duty of care to maintain a sufficient safety distance and to accurately operate the brake system while keeping the front door well.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to stop in the front by negligence while driving in the front, and turned back to the front end of the vehicle driven by the Defendant following the vehicle driven by the Defendant for traffic signal, due to the shock, caused by the shock that the vehicle driven by the Defendant, and the vehicle driven by the Defendant was pushed back in the front end of the vehicle, and the driver was followed by the G taxi driven by the F, which was parked in the front end of the vehicle, and the said taxi was driven by the victim H (30 years old) who was parked in the front end of the vehicle annually.
Ultimately, the Defendant’s above occupational duties.