2. There are no circumstances to consider, such as the fact that the defendant, by receiving a letter from the victims or remitting the amount of damage, showed a sex for the recovery of damage caused by fraud, and that the amount of gambling is not large.

However, even though the defendant was subject to suspended sentence due to the same crime of fraud, the defendant repeated the crime of this case during the grace period, and committed the crime against many good victims, and is also poor in quality of the crime.

In full view of other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, intelligence and environment, the background leading to the instant crime, the means and methods of committing the crime, and the circumstances after committing the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be reversed too much to the extent that it cannot be reversed, and thus, the Defendant’s above assertion by the Defendant is rejected.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.