정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.
If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, only 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who is engaged in self-business, and Defendant B is the head of the secretariat of the DY-gu Federation.
No person shall conceal any false information openly through an information and communications network with intent to defame any other person, thereby impairing the honor of any other person.
1. On December 9, 2016, Defendant A access “F” operated by the Defendant located in E to the Internet G View H H bulletin board, and “CY-gu Association Non-rith three pages, etc.” to the rapid response.
“The title of “Abroston, etc., which entered the head of the Gu-gu Association as a congratulatory money for friendship to the athletes of the Do residents of the Republic of Korea, was not paid to the players who were actually involved, and the head of the Gu-gu Association cannot be aware of the source of use, such as the amount requested for the cooperation by the department store, etc.
The phrase "," posted a false statement as if the victim I were aware of the money and valuables supported by the victim I, thereby undermining the honor of the complainant.
2. Defendant B, on December 9, 2016, using the smartphone (number: J) in the name of the Defendant at the fluoral site on December 9, 2016, becomes the Dooman movement.
Title “ as Title :
A. As indicated in the foregoing paragraph, a link was drawn up and sent to approximately 180 persons, such as the staff team of the DY-gu Federation, group club president, supervisor, and general affairs, and the Internet social network service, NAV online (htp://www.band.us/K) spreaded by posting the Internet Internet community network name “K”, thereby undermining the reputation of the said victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Statement made to I by the police;
1. The posted materials [the Defendants and the defense counsel did not have a purpose of slandering that the instant materials were posted for the public interest in order to urge the audit of the D Sports Promotion Department
The argument is asserted.
However, the whole contents, purpose, form, title, and article posted by the Defendants are damaged.