When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 23:15, 2018, the Defendant reported on October 23:15, 2018, at the front of the Gu B apartment path, 112, that “Any sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat s

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is necessary to strictly punish the defendant who committed violence against a police official on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, in order to establish the State’s legal order.

However, the attitude of recognizing and reflecting crimes seems to be.

Intoxicated, it has been committing a crime by accident.

A relatively long-term fine has no other criminal records except for the previous one.

The punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of such circumstances, the degree of violence, the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant.